Comments on: Paul Heyman Says “Everything” Of WWE’s Attitude Era Is Owed To What ECW Did; Says Vince McMahon Should Be A Heyman Guy

By: Sweetonion

Sweetonion — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:02:02 +0000

Bring back ecw

By: havoc525

havoc525 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:00:59 +0000

If you’re that delusional, there’s no talking sense to you. Troll on buddy.

By: Evon Reese

Evon Reese — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:43:22 +0000

If he doesn't shut up about Vince then it's bye bye Paul.

By: SRP

SRP — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:51:20 +0000

He has former writers to back up his claim. What do you have?

By: Bishop

Bishop — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:09:36 +0000

Bingo

By: SRP

SRP — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:05:57 +0000

WWE was mainstream. That’s the difference. It doesn’t change the fact that their ideas were lifted from ECW.

By: Austin 3:16

Austin 3:16 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:27:10 +0000

That's laughable, Austin never said that. And Heyman had nothing too do with the attitude era. Comparing Sandman too Austin is like comparing Ryan Leaf too Joe Montana

By: Austin 3:16

Austin 3:16 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:25:15 +0000

Heyman is full of shit. He didn't have a damn thing too do with the success of the attitude era.

By: havoc525

havoc525 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:57:15 +0000

Actually, it’s not that “nobody cared,” it’s more having a larger audience. If YOU fall off a ladder through a table “nobody cares,” but Jeff Hardy does it, a few people care, Sin Cara does it and it’s a big deal.

By: Andrew Ace

Andrew Ace — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:36:52 +0000

There’s a difference when someone can take something and make it work. Taz and b.b.b. go through the ring no one cares taker and show do it and its huge and big ratings boost. Sandman is a badass drunk no cares. Stone cold does it it becomes the greatest gimmick in the attitude era and in wrestling period

By: havoc525

havoc525 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:44:35 +0000

Got to admit, he’s pretty damn accurate. Even Austin admits having lifted his Stone Cold gimmick from Sandman for the most part.