Undertaker vs. Sting At WM30?, TNA Equivalent To SD, HHH's Accident, Once In A Lifetime Rematch

The following is today's edition of Ask WNW. Ask WNW is the most popular feature on the website where Richard Gray answers four questions daily, Monday through Friday. To submit your question for the next installment of Ask WNW, click here.
Author:
Updated:
Original:
Wrestlemania 30

While I do not know the circumstances of Sting's current TNA contract (he usually signs one year deals) do you think the WWE should bite the bullet and do whatever it takes to make Undertaker vs. Sting happen at Wrestlemania XXX?

There is no way we can assume Undertaker will be good to go for Wrestlemania XXX next year. He wasn't even sure about Wrestlemania 29 this year until just a few weeks ago. As a huge fan of Undertaker, the end is very near if not upon us. This is why I will continue to push the idea of CM Punk over Undertaker until the match happens. As for Sting, he does work in TNA on a year-to-year basis and was very close to coming to WWE a couple years ago. In an interview last summer, Sting said he was a 9 on a scale of 10 [when asked how close he was to going to WWE]. He won't rule out a WWE run and we all know better to say never in this business.

If TNA ever wants ratings like WWE why not host a secondary television show like Smackdown?

I don't understand this question. How would a secondary show help ratings? A secondary show just adds more expense and more pressure to carry a viable audience. TNA needs to focus 100% on Impact Wrestling and expanding their brand. Smackdown wasn't launched until Monday Night Raw was clearly established as a very popular cable TV program. Eric Bischoff blamed the downfall of WCW on a second live show in Thunder. Recap shows and other programming is fine, but to try and launch another two-hour series of fresh programming to advance storylines would not be a good idea at this point.

So can you find out the answer to the burning question: did Triple H pee his pants or not?

We posted photos here on WrestlingNews.net, questioning whether or not Hunter had an accident during his segment with Brock Lesnar on Raw a couple weeks ago. Triple H said note to self, he'll never go to the ring to fight a guy that big with a full bladder.

What are your thoughts on WWE doing The Rock vs. John Cena at Wrestlemania 29 one year after billing the bout as "Once in a Lifetime"? Did WWE con the fans?

I don't like the idea of a Rock vs. Cena rematch at Wrestlemania 29 this year. The bout was billed as "Once in a Lifetime" last year and should have remained as such. There isn't as much interest in a rematch but Vince McMahon was in favor they do it again for the WWE title. I won't go as far as saying WWE conned fans but it's fair to say they over accentuated the importance of the bout last year for promotional purposes. Perhaps Vince was following the Mayan calendar and when the world didn't end last year, he ordered the high drawing match to be done again.

Remember questions with proper grammar and spelling stand the best chance of getting answered. The next installment of Ask WNW is scheduled to run on Thursday, March 7, 2013.

Check out the Ask WNW archive at this link.

Submit questions to: AskWNW@wrestlingnewsworld.com!

Related Articles